After listening
and reading survivor accounts from the Holocaust and World War II it is
difficult to imagine that such atrocities have occurred and are even occurring today.
I find myself reluctant to call Helen K. and Agate Nesaule human because the courage
and strength these two women displayed lend them super-human qualities.
Although their stories both reflect a dark time in world history and the events
described took place in relative proximity to each other, nationality defined
Agate’s experiences whereas religion defined Helen K’s.
Helen K. had
five years of her life stolen. She spent three years combined in the Warsaw
Ghetto, Majdanek, and Auschwitz; after liberation she spent two years in a
sanatorium recovering her health. None of Helen’s family survived but she was
determined to defy Hitler by surviving and defy him she did; her survivor
interview was recorded in 1985 for use in the Yale University library.
Agate Nesaule and
her family were living in Latvia when war broke out in 1941 between the once
allied Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia; the family lived in a parsonage of which
Agate’s father was the pastor until 1944. Together with several members of her
extended family, Agate voluntarily sailed to German (although it may be argued
whether or not they did so because they were forced to by circumstances beyond
their control) when the Soviets re-occupied Latvia. The Nesaule family would
spend the next six years in work camps and displacement camps before
“immigrating” (or being exiled as many Latvian-Americans considered it) to the
United States in 1950. Agate was able to learn English and received a
university level education which enabled her to have a successful career as a
college professor. However Agate admittedly suffered from bouts of depression,
which I believe were triggered by a sense of survivor’s guilt she had.
Helen’s story is
one of the Holocaust, whereas I would categorize Nesaule’s as one more about World
War II. The Holocaust was perpetrated by Hitler and the Nazi’s whereas Agate
and her family suffered primarily at the hands of the Soviets. This statement
is not meant to diminish the suffering that Agate experienced and neither is it
meant to imply that the Nazis did not bring any tragedy to her life, but rather
it meant to demonstrate that there is a definitive difference between what
Agate experienced and what Helen experienced. As a Jew, Helen was a member of a
group specifically targeted by the Nazis, targeted not just for internment in a
work camp, but targeted for extermination in a death camp. Agate and her family
found themselves in a German work camp after they left Latvia in advance of
Soviet troops. Tragedy followed both girls however it was not to the same
degree: all of Helen’s family perished during the Holocaust while Agate was
able to travel to the United States with all of her immediate family as well as
several members of her extended family. The girls were also different ages
during the war: Helen was a teenager, old enough to marry while still living in
the Warsaw Ghetto; Agate was twelve when her family came to the United States. Being
older Helen made decisions and choices which went beyond the acquisition of
basic needs; Helen was determined to survive so that she might strike down
Hitler’s beliefs regarding Jews and so she might “stick it to the man”. As a
child during the war, Agate did not often look beyond her hunger; her desire to
live did not develop from a deep set of convictions but rather her actions were
a reflection of a basic feeling of self-preservation.
Reading your comparison between the two holocaust survivors I do agree that although they both suffered from a horrific event in human history but they suffering were from different soldiers - one suffered at the hands of Russian soldiers the other directly by Hitler.
ReplyDeleteYes and at least in my mind this is a distinction which must be made. Again I do not mean to say that the suffering is unequal, I just think that it was different for each woman.
ReplyDelete